Chess Players Archives - Chessentials https://chessentials.com/tag/chess-players/ Chess blog about chess tactics, chess games and chess books Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:35:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://chessentials.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/cropped-vjeks2-2-1-32x32.png Chess Players Archives - Chessentials https://chessentials.com/tag/chess-players/ 32 32 Chessentials Chess Quiz #1 https://chessentials.com/chessentials-chess-quiz-1/ https://chessentials.com/chessentials-chess-quiz-1/#respond Sun, 17 Jan 2021 18:34:30 +0000 https://chessentials.com/?p=10252 Introduction Back in my student days, I used to be a big fan of pub quizzes. Every Friday, I would go to a nearby cinema where a weekly pub quiz competition was organized. Eventually, I...

Read More

The post Chessentials Chess Quiz #1 appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
Introduction

Back in my student days, I used to be a big fan of pub quizzes. Every Friday, I would go to a nearby cinema where a weekly pub quiz competition was organized.

Eventually, I gave it up and took up some other hobbies. But in the meantime, my love for the concept definitely remained and even today I go to a pub quiz every now and then (although much less regularly than before).

I was never particularly good at pub quizzes as my knowledge has way too many holes. However, I was always pretty knowledgeable about chess and chess history and I always regretted it that regular pub quizzes don’t have that many chess questions.

Since there are many thematic quizzes out there, I realized I might have a lot of fun participating in a thematic chess quiz. Alas, apart from quizzes at certain competitions here in Croatia, I haven’t found anybody hosting a chess quiz on a regular basis.

This is how I got the idea of solving this “problem” and doing a chess quiz of my own. I am happy to announce the first edition of Chessentials Chess Quiz #1 was held on 16th January 2021. I hope I will manage to sustain it and keep it a regular monthly thing.

In this article, you will find the questions, the answers, and the final standings of the quiz. You can test yourself by trying to answer the questions. If you want to participate in the subsequent chess quizzes, keep track of my Twitter or Facebook as they will be announced there!

Happy solving! Hope you will enjoy it!

Questions


Chess In Popular Culture

Question 1: 

In many ways, 2020 has been a groundbreaking year for chess. Quarantine contributed to more and more people being drawn to the game and chess was continually #growing throughout the year.
But toward the end of the year, things spiraled out of control as Netflix released the TV show Queen’s Gambit, which led to an unprecedented chess boom. Since most of you have (hopefully) watched it, it seemed suitable to open the first edition of the Chessentials chess quiz with an easy one: for half a point:

A) We ask you to tell us the name of the main character of the show and

B) For another half a point, we ask you to write the name of the actress who played the main character of the show (as shown in the pictures on the next slide).


Question 2:

Even though Queen’s Gambit is by far the most popular appearance of chess in popular culture, it is far from being the only one. Every kid from the 90s might recall a famous chess scene that appears in another series featuring a famous orphan with a healthy dose of egoism and anger management issues – the Harry Potter saga.

In a famous scene from the first book/movie from the series (The Philosopher’s Stone), Harry, Ron and Hermione become “living chess pieces” in order to win a  game of “wizard-chess” on a giant board enchanted by professor McGonagall. For half a point, we ask you:

a) Ron, as the best player, took the role of the knight (image on the next slide) and conducted the game. The role of which chess pieces did Harry and Hermione take (respectively)?

b) Which famous American International Master, book author, and book reviewer was asked to compose a chess problem involving a “Ron sacrifice” for the purpose of the movie, only to be one of the very few people NOT to be featured in the end credits of the movie?

(Ronald Weasley as a knight)


Question 3:

Even though Queen’s Gambit is by far the most popular appearance of chess in popular culture, it is far from being the only chess novel ever written (or best, according to me).

When he was not obsessed with underage girls, this Russian writer was fairly obsessed with the game and was an accomplished chess problem composer.

One of his earliest novels from 1930 (adapted to a movie in 2000) features a tragic story about a chess player driven to insanity by the game. For half a point, we ask you:

a) The name of this Russian writer?

b) The name of the movie/novel?


Question 4:

While we are at chess movies – in another book adaptation, we follow the chess path of a 7-year old prodigy on his path toward becoming the champion like Bobby Fischer. For half a point, we ask you:

A) The name of the player whose father Fred wrote the original book and who would become one of the youngest International Master in the world in 1992, at the age of 16 and who have up chess completely in 1999/2000.

B) The name of the movie?


Question 5:

Last, but not least, in this famous movie from 1957, the medieval knight Antonious Block challenges Death, who has come to take his life, to a chess match, in hope of prolonging his life and finding out answers to existential questions about the nature of life and death. For half a point:

a) The name of this iconic movie?

b) The name of the legendary Swedish director of the movie, who is also known for movies such as Cries and Whispers, Personna and Fanny and Alexander.

( A scene from the movie ) 


Guess The Classic

In this section, we will provide you with 5 famous chess positions arising from (recent and less recent) classic chess games. For 0.5 points, we seek:

  • The name of the players involved in the game
  • The move played in the game

Position 1: White to play (London, 1851).


Position 2: Black  to  play  (Buenos  Aires,1927)


Position 3:  White  to  play  (Avro,  Netherlands,  1938)


Position 4:  Black to play  (Moscow,  1985.)


Position 5:  White to  play  (New  York,  2016).


Chess Trivia

Question 1:

Every (good) chess player has had the pleasure of delivering a checkmate at some point during his chess career.

What many chess players don’t know is that the word “checkmate” comes way back from the Persian phrase, whose literal translation is “the King is dead”. How would you announce checkmate in Persian, if you knew that, in some languages such as Croatian, checkmate is even today announced using almost identical pronunciation and that the Russian name for chess highly resembles that phrase?


Question 2:

Some even better chess players have had the pleasure of delivering several checkmates in a very short period of time when playing against multiple opponents.

Strong masters have been organizing large scale simultaneous exhibitions almost since chess appeared in its modern form. In this question, for half a point, we ask you:

a) Which Iranian grandmaster is the current World Record holder for the largest simultaneous exhibition of all time, as he played against 604 players on February 8-9 (25 hours) 2011, winning 580 games, drawing 16 and losing 8?

b) The only thing more impressive than playing a simul is playing a simul blindfolded. Which American chess grandmaster, who due to his feats got the nickname “Blindfold King”, is the current world record holder for most games played in a blindfold simul (48)?


Question 3:

While we are at records – from July 31st, 2018 until October 10th, 2020, Magnus Carlsen achieved an unbeaten streak of 125 games in classical chess. Even though certain Grandmasters with similar long(er) streaks tried to dispute it, Carlsen’s streak is regarded as the longest ever unbeaten streak at the elite level (as he faced much higher-rated opposition than all other contenders).

For half a point, we ask you:

A) Which player brought the streak to an end by beating Magnus on October 10th, 2020?

B) Whose record of 100 undefeated games at the elite level from August 2017 until November 2018, did Magnus break with this feat?


Question 4:

Still in the “records” domain. It is well-known that Emmanuel Lasker spent more years of his life as a World Champion than any other chess player in the history (27). For half a point:

A) Which World Champion is the second behind Lasker in the “most years spent as a World Champion” category?

B) Which World Champion was the World Champion for the shortest period of time?


Question 5:

The modern version of chess most likely developed from an ancient strategy game called chaturanga. However, it is certainly not the only version of the game theorized to have origins in this Indian board game. In Eastern Asia, there are several versions of the game similar to chess but not quite the same. For half a point, we ask you in which countries are the following versions of the game played:

A) Shogi?
B) Janggi?
C) Xiangqi?


Who Said It?

Quote 1: “The threat is stronger than the execution.”

Quote 2: “I was completely winning. If I don’t kill myself tonight, I’m gonna live a thousand years.”

Quote 3: “Nobody ever won a chess game by resigning.”

Quote 4:  “Too weak too slow.”

Quote 5: “Pawn are the soul of chess.”

Quote 6:“That’s called a wooden shield…it’s the wooden shield, look – bing…no…bing…bang…pow…bing…boom…quad….that’s the wooden shield! It’s a wooden shield, see, cause it makes an X!”

Quote 7: “Every chess master was once a beginner.”

Quote 8: “Hello everyone!”

Quote 9: “I don’t believe in psychology. I believe in good moves.”

Quote 10:  “Daniel Naroditsky is a f… prophet. He said immediately that … will likely go with the Scotch Open… and he did, so I had the counterplay and he immediately blundered. Well, that’s gotta be a world record… Thanks for the fat 10 gift subs, Pikachu. My … is throbbing. THROBBING! “


Guess The Player

In the final section of the quiz, we will provide you with 5 pictures of famous chess players and 5 edited excerpts from Wikipedia bios of famous chess players.

For half a point, you have to guess the player on the basis of the photo/bio.


1. Born to Armenian parents on June 17, 1929, in Tiflis, Georgian SSR (modern-day Georgia).

As a young boy, _______ was an excellent student and enjoyed studying, as did his brother Hmayak and sister Vartoosh. He learned to play chess at the age of 8, though his illiterate father _____ encouraged him to continue studying, as he thought chess was unlikely to bring his son any success as a career.

______ was orphaned during World War II and was forced to sweep streets to earn a living.


2. He was awarded the title of Grandmaster by FIDE in 1988. A leading player since 1988,__________ has been ranked at No. 2 on the FIDE world rankingsthree times (July 1991, July 1992, October 2007).

________ […] has also won the World Blitz Championship in 2007 and the World Rapid Championship in 2016.

In 2011, by the decree of the President of Ukraine, ______ was awarded the Order of Prince Yaroslav the Wise.


3. _______(1810 – 22 June 1874) was an English chess master who is generally regarded as the world’s strongest player from 1843 to 1851, largely as a result of his 1843 victory over Pierre Charles Fournier de Saint-Amant.

He promoted a chess set of clearly distinguishable pieces of standardised shape—the ________ pattern promulgated by Nathaniel Cooke — that is still the style required for competitions.

He was the principal organiser of the first international chess tournament in 1851, which made England the world’s leading chess centre and caused Adolf Anderssento be recognised as the world’s strongest player.


4. ________ (5 March 1862 – 17 February 1934)  )a German chess grandmaster. _______ is considered to have been among the strongest chess players and most influential chess teachers of the late 19th and early 20th century.

________ was born in Breslau (Wrocław), in what was then Prussian Silesia and now is Poland. Having finished school in 1880, he left Breslau to study medicine in Halle. With his family, he settled in Nuremberg, Bavaria, and later in Munich, setting up a successful medical practice.

He had five children.


5. Born on July 15, 1928 […] He was raised in Hungary. ____ learned to play chess aged eight from his father, but did not compete in tournaments until age 17, due to World War II. During the war, he dug ditches for the Hungarian army before being captured by the Soviet army, which forced him to be a laborer.

He eventually escaped to his home, only to find that his brother and father had been sent to Russia as laborers, and his mother died as the war neared its conclusion.

He qualified for the 1952 Interzonal tournament, but was unable to compete as he was sent to a concentration camp in March 1952 for attempting to defect to the American embassy in West Berlin during a chess tournament in East Berlin. He remained imprisoned for 16 months, attaining release after Stalin’s death.

He emigrated to the United States in 1958.


6.


7.


8.


9. and 10.


Answers

Chess In Popular Culture

Question 1: a) Beth Harmon; b) Anya Taylor-Joy

Question 2: a) Harry – Bishop, Hermione – Rook. b) IM Jeremy Silman.

Question 3: a) Vladimir Nabokov; b) The Defense / Luzhin’s Defense / The Luzhin Defense

Question 4: a) Joshua Waitzkin; b) Searching for Bobby Fischer

Question 5: a) The Seventh Seal; b) Ingmar Bergman

Guess The Classic


Position 1: a) 22. Qf6+; b) Adolf Anderssen, Lionel Kieseritzky


Position 2: a) 66…. Qdf1+; b) Alexander Alekhine, Jose Raul Capablanca


Position 3: a) 30. Ba3!!; b) Mikhail Botvinnik, Jose Raul Capablanca


Position 4: a) 16… Nd3!; b) Garry Kasparov, Anatoly Karpov


Position 5: a) 50. Qh6!!; b) Magnus Carlsen, Sergey Karjakin


Chess Trivia

Question 1: Shah Mat.

Question 2: a) Ehsan Ghaem-Maghami; b) Timur Gareyev

Question 3: a) Jan Krzystof-Duda; b) Ding Liren

Question 4: a) Alexander Alekhine (17 years — from 1927-1935 and 1937-1946); b) Vassily Smyslov (376 days – from 27th April 1957 until 8th May 1958). In comparison, Tal was world champion for 2 days longer (from 7th May 1960 until 20th May 1961).

Question 5: a) Japan; b) Korea; c) China

Who Said It?

Quote 1: Aaron Nimzowitsch

Quote 2: Ivan Sokolov

Quote 3: Savielly Tartakower

Quote 4: Magnus Carlsen

Quote 5: Francois Andre Philidor

Quote 6: Felix Lengyel a.k.a “xQc”

Quote 7: Irving Chernev

Quote 8: Antonio Radić a.k.a. Agadmator

Quote 9: Robert James Fischer

Quote 10: Charlie White Jr. a.k.a Cr1TiKal/bigmoist/moistcr1tikal/penguinz0

Guess The Player

1. Tigran Petrosian

2. Vasyl Ivanchuk

3. Howard Staunton

4. Siegbert Tarrasch

5. Pal Benko

6. Savielly Tartakower

7. Gata Kamsky

8. Mir Sultan Khan

9. Paul Keres

10. Viktor Korchnoi

Standings

Place Nickname/name Points
1.Christof Sielecki a.k.a. Chessexplained22/26
2.Maaike Keetman16.5/26
3.Qg3!!13/26
4.Bruno Pavčević12.5/26
5.Vjeko Playboy Zeko6/26
6.Diedrich5.5/26
7.Green Dragon Ljubljana (played only 4th and 5th part of the quiz)4.5/26

VOD

The post Chessentials Chess Quiz #1 appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
https://chessentials.com/chessentials-chess-quiz-1/feed/ 0
The Rise and Fall of Soviet Chess? https://chessentials.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-soviet-chess/ https://chessentials.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-soviet-chess/#comments Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:02:28 +0000 https://chessentials.com/?p=10103 The cover photo was taken from a tweet by Douglas Griffin. A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon a very interesting Quora question titled: “Why has Russian chess faded so badly? They haven’t held...

Read More

The post The Rise and Fall of Soviet Chess? appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
The cover photo was taken from a tweet by Douglas Griffin.


A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon a very interesting Quora question titled: “Why has Russian chess faded so badly? They haven’t held the world title for over a dozen years and have only 3 players in the candidates tournament.”

I embarked on writing an answer to it, in which I disputed the very premise of this question, but also tried to offer an explanation why Russia hasn’t had a World Champion for more than a decade.

I was really happy with the final result and considering I am completely incapable of creating novel blog content these days, I’ve decided to replicate yet another Quora answer here, as well 🙂

So without further ado, here it comes copy-pasted 🙂

Hope you will enjoy it 🙂


Warning: Long read about chess history incoming. Read at your own risk!


I have actually made a meme tightly connected to this question quite some time ago – allow me to post it to get everyone’s attention before answering it:

In Soviet Russia, we didn’t have any Norwegian wunderkinds beating our boyz!


Now for real…

This is a great and interesting question, which is very difficult to answer because it is hard to pinpoint one exact reason why Russian/Soviet chessplayers don’t dominate the top of the chess world as they used to in the 2nd half of the 20th century.

Historical events such as the fall of the USSR and the major technological changes that brought to the availability of information (and increased speed of sharing) have had a dramatic impact on the chess world.

It is impossible to talk about Russian chess (or chess of any nation) without taking these social, cultural and technological factors into consideration. Which makes analysis rather complex and demanding.

Even so, I wouldn’t be me if I didn’t at least try. In the course of this answer, I will share some of my own insights and thoughts about how and why Russian/Soviet chess changed in the last 50 years.

I hope you will enjoy it as much as I enjoyed making that meme you can see above. 😛


First of all, I think the premise of the question is too harsh. I wouldn’t say that Russian chess has faded BADLY. According to the federation rankings on the FIDE website, Russia is the country with most Grandmasters, International Masters and Titled players (not to mention those who emigrated to other countries and are still playing).

Number of titled players per country (at the moment of writing)

It is also ranked first by the average rating of the top 10 players.

Therefore, it can still be regarded as the leading chess country in the world.


Also, when you write Russia only has “3 players” in the Candidates tournament, I think you underestimate how tremendous achievement that is (even if one spot was awarded via wildcard).

The qualification process, the level of the opposition and the number of people playing chess have increased exponentially since the 50s and the 60s. 3 players who qualified for the Candidates are in a much higher percentile of best chess players than 3 players who qualified some 50 years ago.


Even if we compare the number of Russian players in 2020 (or 2018) Candidates tournament – 3 – with the number of Soviet players in Candidates tournaments in the past, the difference is not so huge. As an example, I have singled out three editions:

  • Budapest 1950

7 Soviet players out of 10 participants (Bronstein, Boleslavsky, Smyslov, Keres, Kotov, Lilienthal, Flohr).1

Probably not the best argument in my favour, Besides, immediately after the Second World War the hegemony of Soviet players was at its peak.

Probably because Soviet Russia was the winner of the WWII and also the only country which had some sort of “chess scene” developed between the two wars (I read a saying somewhere that Soviet people played chess because they didn’t have anything else to do)

  • Curacao 1962

5 Soviet players out of 8 participants (Petrosian, Geller, Keres, Korchnoi, Tal)2

  • Candidates Cycle 1970–1972

4 Soviet players out of 8 participants (Taimanov, Korchnoi, Geller, Petrosian)3
I mean, you could make an argument that 4,5 or 7 >> 3, but Candidates were never equal to Closed Soviet Championship. Gradual increase of non-Soviet players just as much be attributed to other countries catching up rather as to Soviet players declining in strength.

Additionally, it has to be emphasized that there are major differences between the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation (quite shocking, I know). The majority of the “Soviet” players from the USSR era were not actually Russian players.

For example, in the Budapest Candidates 1950, out of 7 Soviet participants, only Smyslov and Kotov were born in Russia. As for the rest:

It was not particularly different in Curacao 1962 – out of 5 Soviet players, only Korchnoi was born in Russia. As for the rest:

Finally, the 1970-1972 Candidates matches are not different – once again Korchnoi was the only “pure Russian”, while Petrosian, Geller and Mark Taimainov (born in Kharkiv, Ukraine) were not.

Therefore, there is a major difference in the counting of the Candidates participants because we are basically comparing two different entities – USSR and Russian Federation.

If you applied the same principle to 2018 Candidates, you would get 5 “Soviet” players (Kramnik, Grischuk, Karjakin as pure Russians, Aronian as the Armenian and Mamedyarov as Azeri). 4

while in 2020 Candidates, the number would be 4 (Alekseenko, Nepomniachtchi, Grischuk as Russians and Radjabov as Azeri, if you want to count him). 5


So long story short, I think it is very debatable whether Russian chess has really declined so badly. However, everything I have written above doesn’t really answer (or explain) the final part of the question – how come we haven’t had a Russian World Chess Champion for more than a decade?

I think it is impossible to answer that question only with facts, so I have to resort to some speculation and qualitative analysis in order to try to explain it.


So first of all, in order to become a World Chess Champion, both hard work and talent are necessary. In my opinion, one of the main reasons why Soviet players were so successful in the past was precisely the “hard work” area.

As mentioned earlier, “chess” was sort of a national sport in the USSR (both before and especially after WWII). Clubs were organized, lectures were held, tournaments were played and the country had a developed chess culture.

More importantly, in an era where it was difficult to obtain information, chess knowledge was available. While other countries haven’t even heard of chess notation, Soviets were printing tournament bulletins’, chess magazines and chess books. It was possible to have a chess coach when the words “chess coach” didn’t even exist in the English language.

Naturally, when such a huge country gets infected by the chess virus and has a large pool of players, talents are bound to come out of the mass. (A similar effect can be observed in table tennis with China). And even if some champions lacked in “hard work” category (Tal, Spassky) or “talent” category (Botvinnik) they were still able to beat their contemporaries.

Put simply, Soviet Russia was much ahead of the rest of the chess world chess wise.


The only one who was able to break their hegemony was Fischer. Even though I often like to (semi-jokingly) bash him, but his legendary dedication, work-ethic and talent managed to surpass the efforts of an enormous collective (even though he was not without any support in later stages of his career, as well).

In a way, Fischer announced what will happen at the turn of the millennium.

Which leads me to the next point.


What changed in the 90s and especially in the 2000s? Well, due to the advance in technology, the world has changed significantly and the playing field has been leveled due to the following:

  • Availability and accessibility of knowledge and information – it became easier than ever before to find good resources that help you study the game
  • Online playing – in the past, it was very difficult to find an opponent of your own strength (or even someone to play against). Today, it is just a couple of clicks away.
  • Online coaching – in the past, it was very difficult to find a competent chess coach (especially for non-USSR citizens). Today with Skype/Zoom and video conferencing, it is not a problem.
  • Chess engines – Today every patzer is able to find the objective truth in a certain position. And even though there are dangers of getting too “hooked” on the engine, it has certainly accelerated the progress of players who use them as a proper tool.
  • Chess tournaments – In order to improve, it is important to play regularly. Nowadays every “village” has its own Open and one does not need to make a round-trip around Russia to practice the art of playing.

Suddenly, it became possible for highly motivated and talented individuals to “overcame” the system (while being more balanced and less extreme than Fischer). Vishy Anand appeared in the 90s, Veselin Topalov can also arguable be put into this category, while the reigning World Champion – Magnus Carlsen – is probably the best example.


Of course, that is not to say that Russia doesn’t have a system any longer. Due to the heritage and long-standing tradition, they have managed to retain the world number one spot as a country in terms of factors mentioned earlier.

However, it seems to me that the system is only able to take you so far in the modern era where competition is tighter than ever. It seems to me that the system can produce average or even above—average chess players (I am talking 2700-2750 level), but that it is unable to provide that “factor X” required for the World Champion.

Since the world is so fast these days any prodigies keep pushing the boundaries and gaining the GM title at a very young age, I think many other things have to click – how they parents raise them, how they emotionally mature, how they seek and find balance out of chess (and of course, how talented they are), etc.

I think these factors are outside of the system’s reach and that it can only create a nice ground for an individual to prosper.

Not prosper the individual.

(A similar effect can be seen in India, which is able to produce a mass of strong GMs, but only a few of them able to get to the 2700-2750 levels)


To conclude, I’d say that Russian chess has by no means faded so badly, that having 3 Candidates out of 8 in a Candidates tournament is a tremendous achievement and that other factors rather than your nationality are more relevant in order to win the World Chess Championship title.


P.S. Phew, it was a long one. Let me know what you think in the comments – I would like to hear your thoughts on this interesting and complex topic.

The post The Rise and Fall of Soviet Chess? appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
https://chessentials.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-soviet-chess/feed/ 2
Educator, teacher, podcaster – Ben Johnson Interview – Part Two https://chessentials.com/ben-johnson-interview-part-two/ https://chessentials.com/ben-johnson-interview-part-two/#respond Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:08:49 +0000 https://chessentials.com/?p=9764 This is the second part of the interview, in which we talk about Ben’s trading years, his transition back to chess teaching, about Perpetual Chess Podcast and his family. The first part of the interview,...

Read More

The post Educator, teacher, podcaster – Ben Johnson Interview – Part Two appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
This is the second part of the interview, in which we talk about Ben’s trading years, his transition back to chess teaching, about Perpetual Chess Podcast and his family.

The first part of the interview, in which we talk about his early years, his adulthood and time in college and how he got into poker, is available here.


Ben Johnson as a Chess Teacher/Educator

Q: At the end of it all, you decided to get back to your former love – Chess Teaching. During the years you were playing poker and trading, you didn’t do much of that, right?

A:  I was not coaching or even very active in chess from 2003-2015, although many of my best friends were still from the chess world.

In the early poker years, I worked with a former student for free, and I played the occasional tournament, but didn’t study or take it seriously and my results in chess weren’t good. Throughout those years, though, I always fondly recalled my years teaching chess, and I always felt like I could be happy doing it for a living again if circumstances warranted it. (I was right about this, as I do enjoy teaching chess)

I didn’t return to teaching chess until 2015, first on a part-time basis while I still traded, then closer to full time in 2016 when I quit trading.

Q: From the outside, it seems that chess teaching is a big thing in the United States. So many schools, colleges and organizations…How many people make a living out of chess teaching? How difficult and lucrative it is?

A: Good questions! It is very hard to guess accurately, but it wouldn’t surprise me if there are 200-300 full-time chess teachers in the US and many more part-time. For most chess players the most challenging aspects of teaching are going to be classroom management/communication-related.

As for how lucrative, basically no one gets rich teaching chess, but scholastic teachers can make a pretty good hourly wage during the hours they are most in demand, which is primarily after school hours, nights and weekends. The problem can be that this schedule is not very conducive to having a family, because that’s when your wife and kids are home. So in summation, chess teaching is a great job for a young person without a family, but as you get older you have to be very deliberate in planning a professional life that is compatible with other life goals.

Q: As far as I understood, you focus on teaching groups of young kids. Can you describe how an average session looks like? How do you keep their attention without being too pushy? How do you keep the balance between being serious and being fun?

A: Most of my afterschool chess clubs are 75 minutes long. I typically teach something very basic for the first 20 minutes, ranging from how the rook moves to what a pin is. Then they do related puzzles for about 10 minutes, and then they play chess. It is very important to vary the activities, especially with younger kids.

You learn to teach through trial and error! When I was hired by Chess in the Schools I was a terrible teacher, probably 1000 strength. As for the balance between serious and fun, I think chess teachers should be fun. There are a few reasons:

  • We are teaching a game
  • The kids have been in school all day, so it’s a bit unfair to them to be a taskmaster after school too.
  • It keeps them engaged

The challenge can be that if you make too many jokes or are too care-free the students can get a bit silly.

Q: What is the one thing you find the most enjoyable about working with kids?

A: They generally have contagious happiness, as they have not yet been beaten down by life. 😉

Ben Johnson as a Chess Podcaster

Q: Okay, let’s talk about the thing that made you famous – Perpetual Chess Podcast :D.

On your about page, you already hinted at how the idea of a chess podcast came to life. Can you wrap it up and/or elaborate a bit further for the readers?

What motivated me to start the podcast? There are several reasons.

  1. I was and am a huge podcast junkie, and couldn’t believe the lack of offerings about chess. (I have to give a shout out to Macauley Peterson, Lawrence Trent and Simon Williams of the Full English Breakfast though- at the time I dreamed up Perpetual Chess, their podcast had gone dormant, and they had a different format than the long form interview one that I envisioned for Perpetual Chess)
  2. This reason is a bit more personal, but at the time I started the podcast I did not feel very fulfilled professionally. I had just gotten back into teaching chess to kids in Pittsburgh PA after many years of playing poker, and then trading stocks I enjoyed the teaching, but it can be lonely since you are in a different school every day and in Pittsburgh, I didn’t really have any work colleagues. Although my home family life was a reasonably happy one, my wife and I were sleep-deprived and spread a lot thinner financially than we had been before kids)

My feeling of unfulfillment also felt exacerbated by my having young kids at home. I felt like I was surrounded by kids every moment (with the notable exception of my wife), and although I am lucky to like kids, this was a stark difference from the prior 12 years spent primarily working alone in front of my computer and socializing with adults.

The idea of starting a chess interview podcast to me solved two problems at once- it gave me the chance to talk to adults (brilliant ones at that, and about a subject I love), and it was likely to expand my connections in the chess world and help me feel less isolated. Needless to say, I am very happy that I made this decision and forever grateful to my wife that she gave me the space to invest the time and money necessary to pursue this project.

Q: That is fascinating! It is not the first time I hear that a good idea was developed because someone wanted to solve his own problems.

But many people never go beyond the step of thinking of an idea. How long did it take you to start implementing it in real life? Did you have the equipment? Who made the website? Did you have a producer at the very beginning?

Can you tell us how the podcast actually came to life?

A: For about a year I had the idea for this podcast, and even kept a “notes” file on my phone where I brainstormed potential names and guests for the show. I also would frequently check iTunes to see if someone else had started a chess podcast. Part of me wanted someone else to do it, so that I wouldn’t have to think about it anymore!

I am not particularly tech savvy, so what kept me from doing it was not knowing how any of the back-end stuff like recording and uploading worked. That problem was solved, by chance, when I saw a tweet from a finance guy I follow on Twitter, Patrick O Shaughnessy. He was singing the praises of his podcast producer, Mathew Passy and recommending him for anyone thinking of starting a podcast. I reached out to Mathew and he helped me take it from there.

Q: And so it took off. I have listened to the very first episode with Greg Shahade the other day and I kinda got the feeling I was listening to two high-school friends who were surprised themselves that they are talking about chess and recording it (I don’t mean it in a bad way – I died from laughter).

Looking back, what do you think about the first steps? Did you have your doubts? Were you afraid no one would ever listen to it?

A: I was pretty confident that there was an audience for a chess podcast- because I wanted one myself. What I was more concerned with was that someone more qualified than me should be the one doing it! Listening to those early interviews makes me cringe, but I wasn’t going to learn to podcast without just doing it.

Q: But okay, you have come very far since. 131 episodes later you have spoken to a number of world-class GMs, chess content creators and businessman. You have also gained a decent number of Patreon supporters.

Did you even think at the beginning podcasting might become more than a hobby? A profession? A business?

I would be lying if I did not admit that I also saw creating a chess podcast as a business opportunity. As a big podcast fan, I had seen how creating a podcast had changed the life of Marc Maron in the comedy world, and of Nate Duncan in the NBA world, just to name two of my favorite podcasters.

Chess obviously is not as popular as show business or the NBA, so I didn’t expect success on that scale, but I figured that at minimum, Perpetual Chess could be a decent, gratifying side-hustle that augmented my teaching, and thanks primarily to the Perpetual Chess Patreon supporters, that is what it has grown to be as of now.

Q: How many people are working on the podcast? Have you reached the point where the income is higher than the expenses?

A: It is just two people- me and my producer. Mathew Passy. Without Mathew, the podcast would not be possible. He does the editing, plus the troubleshooting on any tech issues I encounter. I am happy to report that thanks to the Patreon supporters of Perpetual Chess it is reasonably profitable. As I have said on the podcast, it undoubtedly has the lowest hourly rate of all my work (chess and poker both), but I enjoy doing it, and if the revenue continues to grow it should be sustainable for a while.

Matthew Passy – the man behind the scenes (Photo taken from Matthew’s Twitter)

Q:  You always seem excellently prepared for every interview. How much time does it take you to do so? How much does it take you to promote it on iTunes and social media?

Can you take us through the process of recording an episode? From the preparations to the very interview and the (post) production?

A: Thanks! I take pride in preparing as much as I can for every interview because it is the aspect of producing a good show that I feel like I have the most control over. I know that there are plenty of stronger chess players than me and lots of people know more chess history, so being fully prepared for and focused during the interview is the least I can do.

As for how the podcast gets made. First I try to chase down a guest. 😉 Sometimes this can take one email, sometimes I feel like everyone I ask is ignoring me. Also sometimes someone is initially responsive, but then disappears. This is frustrating because it makes it hard to sequence guests and not a miss a show or overbook with the limited amount of time for interviews that I have. Scheduling guests is my least favorite part of creating Perpetual Chess.

Once a guest is scheduled, I alert my Patreon supporters in case they want to submit questions, then begin research. If its an author I try to read at least one book of theirs, usually the most recent. If not, I scour the internet for other interviews or check out whatever project they are doing. I probably average about 5 hours of prep per guest, but it depends a lot on who it is and how much they have written. The good news is that it often doesn’t feel like work, because I am reading about chess and learning new things. Recording the interviews is my absolute favorite part of doing the podcast, and makes it all worth it. When I am talking to the likes of Gata Kamsky or Judit Polgar and they share a story or tip that I know my listeners will enjoy I really feel like I should pinch myself at times.

Once the interview is recorded (on Skype). I send it off to my editor/producer with any edits and he makes the edits, adjust sound levels if necessary and posts it be released on my hosting page when ready. Once it is ready for upload, I relisten to the interview and post show notes and links. This adds another 60-90 minutes to the amount of time it takes, but I do think it greatly improves the product.

Then when it is released, on Tuesdays, it takes about an hour to do the release stuff. I tweet about it, which takes annoyingly long to compose due to Twitter’s character limits. There is also posting it on the webpage, sharing to the email list, via MailChimp, and sharing in the Facebook group. This stuff takes about an hour in total, but is relatively mindless.

Q: Do you have some episodes you are particularly proud or fond of?

A: So many that it really is hard to list. Not because of anything that I did, but just because chess has so many great personalities with awesome stories to tell. I have noticed that experienced chess authors are amongst my favorite guests. This makes me think of guests like GMs Genna Sosonko and Jacob Aagaard, and IMs John Watson and John Donaldson.

I also felt privileged to get to interview GM Gata Kamsky, as he has such an incredible career and interesting life, and he doesn’t seem to do a lot of long-form interviews.

Q: Do you have any future plans regarding the podcast? Have you defined a specific goal, or are you simply “going with the flow” and waiting to see where it takes you?

A: Definitely “going with the flow,” It is really hard for me to keep putting out an episode per week, so I never seem to find the time to think more big picture. If I had more free time I would focus a lot more on the “macro” aspect of the show, and could think more about stuff like soliciting sponsors, updating the webpage, selling merchandise, making additional content, etc., but as it is, I feel like I just barely get an episode out each week. So I fall back on the content creator’s mantra that if I put out a quality product everything else will take care of itself (someday.)

Q: Apart from Patreon, how else can people support your work?

A: Spreading the word about the podcast is always helpful.

Ben Johnson Off The Board

Q: Okay, last but not least, I would like to find out something about Ben as a person. 1

I know you are married with two kids. But can you tell us how and when did you meet your wife?

A: My wife and I met through an online dating site in 2008. At the time I was an online poker pro, living in Brooklyn NY. Poker, like chess, has been a predominantly male-dominated field, so it was hard to meet women at times. For any lonely chess players out there, I strongly recommend overcoming your inhibitions and trying online dating.

Q: Did you have a magical pick-up line? Or did you stick to the good old „Hi, I’m Ben?“ 😀

A: Haha. This could be the subject of its own podcast, but let’s say I was better at writing friendly somewhat humorous emails to women I’d never met then I was at approaching them. I suspect this would be true of many chess players.

Q: Since you have a successful track record and since many chess players are struggling in that domain, what would your piece of advice to them be? 😀

A: Hmm, depends on whether you are trying to be a teacher, a content creator, or both. But I think it is generally good advice to pick one thing or one small aspect of a field and try to do it really well and really consistently.

Q: How old are your children? What are their names?

A: They are 6 and 3, a boy and a girl.

Q: Have you started teaching them chess? There is strong evidence one of them is quite incompetent in that field 😀

A: Ha! I teach the chess club at my 6 yr old’s school. So far he prefers “giveaway chess“ aka “suicide chess“ to regular chess, but he does seem to enjoy the social aspect of the chess club.

Ben in the father role (taken from his Twitter)

Q: How do you balance your professional and family obligations? How does an average day in the Johnson family look like?

A: Oh man, it is so hectic. It is hard to balance especially because I am a freelancer. My wife has a demanding full-time job so a lot of the parenting grunt work falls to me, such as getting the kids ready for school, cooking dinner, taking them to music classes, etc.

Q: If someone asked you about a secret to being a good parent, what would you say? What would your advice be to other future (and current) parents?

A: My kids will be able to tell you in 20 years whether I am a good person to answer this, but I can give basically the same advice I did with regard to teaching and content creation- Don’t halfass it!

Q: Apart from chess, poker, podcasting, stocks, TV shows and family, do you do anything else in your free time? 2Do you have any other hobbies?

A: I think you covered all of my interests except for sports. I am a big NBA and Major League Baseball fan. As a native Philadelphia, the 76ers and Phillies are my teams, but I follow the leagues as a whole as well.

Q: I am going to make a random guess here, but I somehow imagine you read a lot. Can you give us a list of your five favorites (non-chess) books of all-time? Or five good books you read recently? 3 

A: I love reading and was reading 1-2 books per week until my kids were born. Arg!

In my teens and 20s, I read a good amount of fiction- I liked Murakami and Milan Kundera among many others. These days I read mostly non-fiction if/when I have time.

Seth Godin is half motivational writer half marketing wizard, and I love his books and his blog. Recently I have been loving the writing of Scott Galloway who I guess you would call a business writer. I just started reading The Algebra of Happiness and it strikes me as a  great book for a 20 something trying to find him or herself. Scott Galloway also does a free weekly column called No Mercy No Malice that everyone should read.

Both Seth Godin and Scott Galloway have podcasts too, because of the way things work these days.

Also, read everything by Michael Lewis.

Lastly, if you haven’t read Born Standing Up by Steve Martin, an American actor and comedian, you should!

Q: Do you have any intentions of getting back to serious tournament chess at some point?

A: That is a very good question. I do miss competing, but as a competitive person, it would be hard for me to enjoy without feeling like I was in decent playing shape. And in order for that to happen, I would need to spend 5-10 hours a week studying for a solid 3 months, at minimum. That is not happening imminently, unfortunately. But I definitely want to get back in the ring if my professional and family responsibilities ever settle down. Sadly, that may not be until my kids are in college, but chess is always there for you!

Q: Do you have a life motto? If yes, which one is it?

A: As my friend, IM-elect Donny Ariel famously said, “ life is about the quality of your relationships.“

Q: If you could invite three persons to dinner, whom would you invite?

A: Wow, should I be asking someone this on the podcast? Let’s go with Grischuk, Anand and Barack Obama.

Q: Last, but not least, is there a message you’d like to send the readers? Especially to those who don’t know what to do with their life? Who are struggling to find their passion?

A: OK, its gonna be impossible for this not to sound like a cliche. When you are young, without family you should be trying stuff. Quit your job, start a blog, start a YouTube channel- take chances. If you are not sure what your “passion“ is, think back to what interested you as a child. And read a lot!

Q: Phew, we have finally made it to the end. Thank you so much, Ben, on your time and on your effort – the depth and the length of your answers were quite amazing!

It was a real pleasure talking to you and telling your interesting and fascinating story to the broader public.

We wish you all the best in the future and hope for further growth of the Perpetual Chess Podcast audience 4!

A: Thanks Vjeko! I feel like anyone who read this much about me should win a prize! Thanks to anyone who read this, and good luck with your chess writing!

Links where you can find more about Ben

Perpetual Chess Podcast Website

Perpetual Chess Podcast Patreon

Perpetual Chess Podcast on Apple Tunes

Ben’s Twitter

Perpetual Chess Podcast Facebook Group

Perpetual Chess Academy

Ben’s Chesscom profile


This is the second part of the interview, in which we talk about Ben’s trading years, his transition back to chess teaching, about Perpetual Chess Podcast and his family.

The first part of the interview, in which we talk about his early years, his adulthood and time in college and how he got into poker, is available here.

The post Educator, teacher, podcaster – Ben Johnson Interview – Part Two appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
https://chessentials.com/ben-johnson-interview-part-two/feed/ 0
Educator, teacher, podcaster – Ben Johnson Interview – Part One https://chessentials.com/ben-johnson-interview-part-one/ https://chessentials.com/ben-johnson-interview-part-one/#respond Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:54:45 +0000 https://chessentials.com/?p=9763 This is the first part of the interview, in which we talk about Ben’s early years, his adulthood and time in college and how he got into poker. The second part of the interview, in...

Read More

The post Educator, teacher, podcaster – Ben Johnson Interview – Part One appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
This is the first part of the interview, in which we talk about Ben’s early years, his adulthood and time in college and how he got into poker.

The second part of the interview, in which we talk about his trading years, his transition back to chess teaching, about Perpetual Chess Podcast and his family, is available here.


Introduction

Even though the chess world has been full of chess playing websites, book reading apps, computer engines, youtube channels and mediocre blogs 1 from the start of the digital era, for a long time it was severy lacking in the area of podcasts.

Apart from the Full English Breakfast 2, at the end of 2016, there wasn’t a single one out there. This gap was recognized by a former Poker player, trader and nowadays a chess teacher from New Jersey: Ben Johnson.

In December 2016, a first episode of the new Perpetual Chess Podcast was aired and as they say, the rest is history. 131 episodes and 195 patrons later, 3 The Perpetual Chess Podcast has gained a lot of recognition, and won the hearts of chess players worldwide by allowing them insight into the lives and minds of world best chess players, authors and promoters of the game.

A couple of weeks ago, I contacted Ben on a completely unrelated note. 4 The mail exchange was extremely pleasant, Ben indeed turned out to be the nice guy he seemed to be in his podcasts. So I ventured to ask him if he would be like to be the man on the other side of the microphone for a change and do an interview for Chessentials.

I am incredibly thankful to him for this. Even though I overdid it with the number of questions 5, Ben answered every single one of them – in great detail.

I am very happy he did so – I find his life story fascinating and inspiring. I think there is a lot to learn about chess, life, poker, business and being a decent human being, in general.

Hope you guys will enjoy it as much as I did.

Ben Johnson as a Kid

Q: Hi Ben! It is a pleasure and honor to have you on Chessentials. Since you have a very rich and versatile biography, there is a lot I want to ask you. But since this is a chess blog and you are a chess podcaster, it probably makes sense to start with chess-related questions. Can you tell me when and how you learned to play the game?

A: Thanks for thinking of me, Vjeko! As I mentioned to you via email, I am not sure if anyone will care about my background, but I will spell it all out here just in case.

I was introduced to chess by a family friend at the age of 6, I was immediately taken by it, but back in the stone ages I was one of those people who did not know at that time that chess books and tournaments existed, so I was not exposed to the game again for a long time.

Q: How long did it take you to start playing it „seriously“? How did that happen?

A: At the age of 12 I rediscovered the game when some kids from the just-forming school chess club were playing at lunchtime in the cafeteria. A friend and I approached them, joined the club, and the rest, as they say, is history.

That program – the Masterman Chess Club in Philadelphia PA – went on to win many US Scholastic team championships, with several master level player graduates, along with its most well- known chess alumni, my good friends IM Greg Shahade and WIM Jenn Shahade.

Ben Johnson and Greg Shahade in 1992 (Photo from Ben’s private archive)

Q: Okay, now I understand why Greg was the very first guest of the podcast and why you announced that you sometimes have great guests, but sometimes you also have Greg during his latest (third) appearance. 😀

Anyway – 12 is a “relatively” late age to start playing chess 6, in terms of becoming a World Champion or professional. I can easily imagine a kid losing motivation after being beaten by his peers who have had a head start.

Was this the case with you? Could you already feel a marked difference of level between Greg (and/or other 12-year olds) and yourself? Did you ever get discouraged?

A: I agree that it feels like a late start these days, but that was less the case back then. In my later teenage years, I would often be on the bottom half of the US Chess “Top 50” (now top 100)  lists for my age, so at that time I occasionally regretted having not started playing chess earlier, but mainly I was happy to be enjoying a new hobby.

As for feeling discouraged, I have always thought it was a good thing for me to encounter someone with more chess talent early in life, as it kept me motivated and kept me humble. I think this was particularly helpful when I became a poker pro, as I will likely detail later.

Q: In the end, you not only stuck to chess, but became a fairly decent player. According to your About page on Perpetual Chess Academy, you earned the title of the USCF National Chess Master and reached peak USCF rating of 2279 in 1995 – when you were 18. Considering your late start, it sounds like a great achievement.

Can you briefly take us through that journey? How serious was your approach to the game? Did you have a training routine? How often did you play? How did you balance chess with school obligations and… you know.. having a childhood?

A: During those years I loved chess and spent a good amount of time on it, but I would not say it was an unhealthy amount. The Masterman Chess Club had afterschool chess club twice a week, and I probably averaged playing two tournaments a month. I never had a personal coach, although Mike Shahade (Greg and Jenn’s dad, who is a US Chess Senior Master), certainly helped me out along the way. On my own, I studied maybe 5 hours a week on average, but I did it because I enjoyed it, not because anyone was pushing me, or because of any sort of driving ambition or goal.

Ben Johnson as a College Student

Q: Considering the circumstances, it is reasonable to guess why it was your peak. If I calculated correctly, 7 not long after you achieved your personal best, it was time to go to college.

First thing I would like to ask – in one of the episodes with Greg, you „cursed“ him because he got a chess scholarship for which you also applied. Since such things don’t exist in Croatia, could you explain what exactly it was about?

Did you already back then want to try for a chess career? Or was it more of a „that-sounds-nice-me-like-it“ decision?

A: Wow Vjeko, you really did your homework!

So, to clarify,  Greg received two different distinctions in a span of a few years:

  • A scholarship to University of Maryland-Baltimore County (UMBC) in 1996- at the time UMBC was one of the only schools giving full scholarships to strong chess players. Greg was a year lower than me in school, so that did not factor into my college decision, and going to UMBC was not something I seriously considered. I really enjoyed my college experience at Pomona College.
  • A few years later, in 1999, Greg also won a very prestigious award called The Samford Fellowship. This fellowship gives money to the top young American chess player each year to pursue chess professionally. This is the one I was jealous of! However, let it be noted I was not jealous in the sense that I thought I deserved the award- I was 300 points lower rated than Greg and by now had long been his whipping boy in blitz matches. There were dozens of kids more qualified to receive this award than me, and I had no illusions about that.

What  I was jealous of the lifestyle that the Samford afforded Greg- he had quit UMBC about a year after starting, and the Samford enabled him to not work, sleep in every day, play and study chess,  etc. To a 20-year-old racking up student loans this lifestyle sounded pretty good!

Q: In the end, you chose Pomona College where you graduated in Russian and History. How exactly did you choose those particular majors at that particular college?

A: I chose Pomona College, as it was the most prestigious and appealing school that I was admitted to. Believe it or not, I also had vague ambitions of playing college baseball. Once I got there though, I quickly realized that I wasn’t even good enough at baseball to make their team.

California is quite far from Philadelphia, and I liked the idea of “striking out on my own.“ As for my majors, politics was a subject that always interested me in an academic sense. I started studying Russian because I often heard it spoken at chess tournaments. I used to joke (sort of joke) that I wanted to be able to make sure my opponents weren’t cheating when they conversed in Russian during my chess games.

Q: How did chess fare during your study years? I recall you mentioning in one of the episodes you didn’t work seriously on chess after the age of 18. Is that correct?

A: My chess fell by the wayside pretty quickly. I couldn’t afford a car in college and thus couldn’t really get to any tournaments.  Without competing I didn’t have much desire to study chess, so I played blitz when I could, and played a few tournaments a year, but I didn’t spend nearly as much time on chess all in all.

Q: One of my favourite episodes of the Perpetual Chess Podcast is the episode nr. 42, featuring notable entrepreneur and anti-college advocate James Altucher. Although I don’t agree with him about everything and am not the biggest fan of his marketing methods, I learned a lot from his blog and books.

Considering you ended up doing something completely unrelated to your studies I am really curious about how you look back at your college years today. Where do you stand in the whole „College is not worth it“ debate?

A: Yes, I really enjoyed the James Altucher interview as well! I also do not agree with him on everything, but I am sympathetic to the arguments he makes about the cost-effectiveness of college. I think that the R.O.I on elite institutions is still decent despite the hefty tuition, but I think it would be an economic mistake to borrow $50K a year to study the humanities at an average university. As a parent, I think about these questions a lot, and I hope that the structure of American universities is changed in some way before my kids reach college age. Hopefully, you have a better system in Croatia! 8

Ben Johnson as a Young Adult

Q: In any case, time flew by, the „finish college“ mark was checked and adulthood knocked on the door. According to the About page on Perpetual Chess Podcast (you seem to have a lot of them :P), you said you worked two years after college in an office job. What kind of job it was?

A: After university, I took a job as a Legal Assistant/Paralegal in New York with the intention of going to Law School. Basically, my work entailed getting various documents for lawyers and sometimes scanning them for particular words, etc. The work was boring, but New York was fun.

Q: Where did this sudden transition to the law come from? Did you even try to find a job within your field of expertise (Russian/History)?

A: Not especially. Here in the US, it was fairly common to just pick a field of general interest within “the humanities” in University and then pursue a general job once graduating. I selected subjects to major in because one must pick a major, but I never felt like I had a clear sense of what my professional ambitions were. For such kids considering a career in law is fairly common, and my mom is a lawyer, so it was always a possibility in my mind.

Q: You mentioned the work in the office was boring. How fast did you figure out that the traditional 9-5 work might not be for you?

A: My decision not to work 9-5 that came about through trial and error.

After I finished working as a Legal Assistant/Paralegal I decided to apply for law schools despite seeing a lot of unhappy lawyers at my law office. I felt like I didn’t know what else to do.  While applying to law schools, I decided to teach chess for a year for Chess in the Schools.

Working at Chess in the Schools was when I became good friends with Mike Klein, (of chess.com and chesskid.com) as well- we were friendly from the US Chess Scholastic circuit, but started work at CIS the same year and ultimately became good friends and were roommates for 2 years.

Once I was teaching chess I realized I enjoyed it much more than office work, and fairly quickly decided not to pursue a career in law.

I should mention that during these years, I also had been playing poker by this point for a few years. Me and a few other chess players, including Greg Shahade, IM elect Donny Ariel and our friend Yakov Hirsch, who is a USCF expert,  all became immersed in poker together and began to make money as poker became increasingly popular and lucrative. In my mind, my nascent success in poker was another reason to freelance as a chess teacher rather than immerse myself in the rigors of law school or a more traditional 9-5, as it allowed me more time to play poker and see what came of it.

Ben Johnson as a Poker Player

Q: Ah yes. Poker! Everyone listening to your podcast has heard you mentioning it and discussing it on air. 9

Can you tell us when did you start playing poker? How did you come into contact with the game?

A: Yes, those who have been with Perpetual Chess from the beginning may have heard more poker mentions than they desired! I hope that I have gotten better at “sticking to chess“, or at least avoiding a lot of poker talk on the podcast as time has gone on.

I had discovered the world of poker via the movie Rounders in 1999 and ordered my first poker book a few days after seeing it.

As I mentioned above – I soon started playing it together with some other chess players. And earning some money.

Q: It sounds to me you started doing it as a hobby first. When did you realize it might become a career?

A: I was playing poker as a hobby while working from 1999 to 2003. Although it was a hobby, I developed an ambition quite quickly of playing it for a living.  In 2003 I started to have a lot of success playing poker, both in tournaments (which there is sort of a record of) and in online “cash games” which basically are buy in with what you want and leave with what you want. You also aren’t tracked publicly. You can sort of trace the timeline of my poker career by seeing my tournament record here. I also “multi-tabled” online, and was pretty successful with that as well.

(Note that although these are big numbers, they are “net winnings” and don’t reflect all the tournaments someone buys into and doesn’t make money in. Despite the buyins, overall I was doing very well in tournaments though. )

My first “big score” was in September of 2003, the beginning of the school year. The Borgata Poker Open for $11,000. That was the tournament that allowed me to finish paying off my student loan debts, and I continued to have success in cash games from there. So I finished out that school year from 2003-2004 as a chess teacher, then transitioned to playing poker full time in June 2004 by which point, I had a couple of even bigger tournament scores, including winning $80,000 for coming in  36th place in the Main Event of the World Series of Poker in 2004.

Looking back now, the money I was winning is hard to fathom, as I work pretty hard to earn a normal wage here in 2019, but at that time there was just a ton of money flowing into poker, and if you read some books, had good emotional control and had some luck you could have results like I did, without being a poker genius.

Today, that is not the case!

Ben in the “zone” (Taken from his pokerdb profile)

Q: Yes, I have heard several times that the “Golden Era Of Poker” is behind us. Can you elaborate for the uninitiated? What made the difference?

A: A confluence of events led to an explosion in the popularity of poker. Probably the biggest factor was that a “hole-card camera” was invented that let people watch broadcasts of poker and see the players cards. This made everyone think they could be poker champions too, so lots of people tried poker online and at casinos.  As a result, games were extremely profitable in the 2000s, as it turned out most people weren’t so good! 😉 Once new “fish” stopped entering the pond, the fights for the old ones got more intense, and it became harder to make good money.

Q: Poker also started gaining more prominence… of authorities. We all know the example of Francisco Vallejo Pons 10. There were other events. For instance, 2011 is also when the US government unexpectedly shut down the biggest online poker sites, known to poker players as “Black Friday”.

 In a previous interview, Polish FM Kamil Plichta – who also makes a living out of poker, told me his parents weren’t satisfied with him “devoting time to that stupid card game”. How did your parents react when you told them :D?

A: My mom would have agreed with Kamil’s parents! In her defense, she had seen me come up on the short side of a few gambling encounters with chess hustlers in my teens, so I think her suspicion was warranted. My success at poker ultimately sort of won my mom over, but she has a bit of hippie-ness in her heart, so even when I was making a lot of money playing poker I think she would have preferred I be a broke poet rather than a rich poker player.

Like most parents, she mainly wanted me to be happy though.

On the other hand, my dad is an optimist by nature, and an avid sports fan, so to him the idea of competing to make money was one he could get behind right away, and he was my biggest fan when I was competing in tournaments regularly.

Q: You are definitely not the first chess player who fell in love with this particular card game. You already mentioned some names. There are other renowned examples, such as Jen Shahade or James Altucher. Even some world class player, like Hikaru Nakamura, Peter Svidler, afore-mentioned Francisco-Vallejo Pons or Alexander Grischuk have played it. Or still do.

In the podcast, you also mentioned several world-class poker players who have achieved 2200-2300 levels in chess.

I also know two lesser-known examples: Croatian IM Goran Djurović and the above-mentioned Chessentials guest Kamil Plichta.

Is there a reason why so many chess players get involved with poker? Can you reveal the secret behind this connection between two games that seemingly have nothing in common?

A: I think the mentality that chess instills is perfect for poker. In chess when you lose, you must honestly assess what you did wrong. There is invariably lots of study involved.

In poker, there is so much variance that one can avoid that question and blame luck if so inclined. Chess players generally are willing to look past the variance and “take responsibility for their results,“ and that goes a long way in poker.

The other thing is that chess has often attracted a type of person that is not interested in conventional academic pursuits and conventional jobs. Since seemingly every chess player knows another chess player who has become a poker pro it is a natural avenue to explore if one is seeking to avoid real life 😉

Q: Have you ever met some of the chess greats in a poker hall? Does your friendship with Jan Gustafsson stem from there? 11

A: I have played poker with one of the original chess to poker cross over heroes, Dan Harrington, who reached about 2400 USCF and has had great success as a poker tournament player and author. Similarly, I am old friends with FM Ylon Schwartz, who is a chess lifer who made 2 million + in the World Series of Poker Main Event one year. I have not played poker with any true chess legends, like Hikaru, though.

As for Jan, I knew him through Greg Shahade before any of us were into poker, but our time as poker pros overlapped. Following my biggest poker tournament success, in Baden, Austria in 2006, I and another friend went to Hamburg to see the city and visit Jan. We had a good time.

Q: How is the process of improving at poker similar to the process of improving at chess? What does the poker training routine consist of?

A: Well is has changed a lot since my heyday. Back then, the 3 ways to improve were:

  • Read books
  • Study with computers. Programs like Pokertracker collected all of the hands you played online and helped you figure out in what situations you were making money and in which you were leaking it
  • Talk over hands with other players

These days those things still apply, but there has also been an explosion in “poker solvers,“ something Jen Shahade talked about on Perpetual Chess, and that she discusses in her fun new poker podcast, The Grid. I still play a bit of poker, but I have not had the time or inclination to keep up with this amazing technology, instead, I try to learn from those who make videos synthesizing the information.

Q: As the old saying goes – all good things come to an end. In 2011, you said farewell to professional poker after 7 years. Can you tell us why?

A: As I explained above, it became more difficult. After some great years making 6 figure income, my earnings were slowing down significantly. I wasn’t working as hard on my game as I needed to be. I was also tired of traveling to casinos for tournaments and wasn’t particularly interested in traveling/moving just to chase the best games, which was becoming increasingly necessary.

Plus I had gotten quite interested in financial markets and trading starting in 2008 during the financial crisis.

After the “Black Friday”. I decided to focus on trading stocks- something I ultimately devoted 5 years to.

Q: Oh, I didn’t realize you were trading for so long. I think in the episode with Altucher you said that you weren’t that successful (as in – say – poker) and that you were “somewhere around zero” in total. Is that true?

A: Well, if you consider opportunity cost and cost of living trading was not even a break-even endeavor for me. I devoted years to studying, practicing and journaling trading, and I am proud of the approach I took despite a lack of success.

But when my second child was born, I had been pursuing trading for 5 years. My results were decent, and over a large sample were ever so slowly improving, but I had no idea if success was weeks away, years away or would never come. I realized that this lifestyle was not conducive to helping support a family and walked away for good.
In hindsight, I do not regret devoting years to trading, but I do regret putting so many eggs in that basket. I should have taught chess or played poker part-time while doing this so that I did not draw down my savings to such an extent.
Live and learn!

Q: How come you decided for day trading? I have done some investing on the side myself and literally, every book, from Benjamin Graham’s Intelligent Investor to A Random Walk Down Wall Street advised against it and recommended buy and hold instead.

With hindsight, which trading strategy would you recommend to a young investor?

A: I tried every trading/investing approach under the sun, and ultimately was drawn to day trading futures markets. I liked the combination of data analysis and pattern recognition that it required similar to poker. Based on my experience, I cannot argue with those who argue against it. I would guess that 1% of people that attempt to day trade find a way to consistently generate income, and I was not amongst that 1%.

With hindsight, I would not recommend any trading strategy to a young investor. Passive investing is the way to go. Even the “value investing” espoused by Benjamin Graham is having a tough go of late, as value investing is now taught in every business school in the world.  If you are looking for an edge in a market the financial markets are about the last place I would look! Sorry to be so cynical, but this is also the advice that I heard and read as well before I ignored it and insisted on going and making my own mistakes! 😉

Links where you can find more about Ben

Perpetual Chess Podcast Website

Perpetual Chess Podcast Patreon

Perpetual Chess Podcast on Apple Tunes

Ben’s Twitter

Perpetual Chess Podcast Facebook Group

Perpetual Chess Academy

Ben’s Chesscom profile


This is the first part of the interview, in which we talk about Ben’s early years, his adulthood and time in college and how he got into poker.

The second part of the interview, in which we talk about his trading years, his transition back to chess teaching, about Perpetual Chess Podcast and his family, is available here.

The post Educator, teacher, podcaster – Ben Johnson Interview – Part One appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
https://chessentials.com/ben-johnson-interview-part-one/feed/ 0
Ivan Sokolov Birthday https://chessentials.com/ivan-sokolov/ https://chessentials.com/ivan-sokolov/#respond Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:01:04 +0000 https://chessentials.com/?p=9755 „ If I don’t kill myself tonight, I’m gonna live a thousand years!“ These immortal words were uttered on 13.01.2013. during the 2nd round of Tata Steel 2013 chess tournament by a famous grandmaster and...

Read More

The post Ivan Sokolov Birthday appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>

„ If I don’t kill myself tonight, I’m gonna live a thousand years!“

These immortal words were uttered on 13.01.2013. during the 2nd round of Tata Steel 2013 chess tournament by a famous grandmaster and chess author, Ivan Sokolov.


Sokolov was born in Jajce in former Yugoslavia (today’s Bosnia and Herzegovina). He quickly rose to prominence, becoming an FM in 1985 at the age of 17, IM in 1986 at the age of 18 and GM in 1987 at the age of 19. Even though these figures don’t seem impressive from today’s perspective, at a time he was the fifth-youngest grandmaster in history, behind Fischer, Tal, Kasparov and Spassky.

Although he was studying law at a time, he decided to give it up and pursue a career of professional. He would become a part of the World Elite for the next 20 years, playing against the top players in the world and winning several international tournaments.

At his peak – in 1992 – Sokolov was the 12th ranked player in the world (rated 2630 – a sign of times). In the 2000s, he also managed to cross the 2700 barrier.

He particularly distinguished himself during the Hoogovens 1999 tournament. In a strong line-up including Kasparov, Anand, Kramnik, Shirov, Timman, Ivanchuk, Svidler and Topalov, Sokolov finished 4th. He managed to beat the great Garry Kasparov by out preparing him in a variation of the Nimzo-Indian. Even though Gazza managed to win the tournament, he never forgot that defeat, since he mentioned it several times in his On Garry Kasparov book series.

Later in life, he became a renowned book author, publishing 5 chess books in the 2008-2015 period.

It is a pity that, due to the war in Bosnia, he emigrated in 1992 and became a Dutch citizen. But unfortunately, failing to prevent the talented from leaving the country has become a trademark of Balkan ever since…

To find out more about Ivan, read this fantastic Chessbase Interview

(If you like posts such as this one, check our complete list of Chess Birthdays )

The post Ivan Sokolov Birthday appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
https://chessentials.com/ivan-sokolov/feed/ 0
Sir George Alan Thomas Birthday https://chessentials.com/sir-george-alan-thomas/ https://chessentials.com/sir-george-alan-thomas/#respond Sun, 16 Jun 2019 19:58:36 +0000 https://chessentials.com/?p=9754 I first stumbled on the name of Sir George Alan Thomas in my favorite childhood chess book, The Art Of The Checkmate. I am not even sure whether the book included his victory over an...

Read More

The post Sir George Alan Thomas Birthday appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
I first stumbled on the name of Sir George Alan Thomas in my favorite childhood chess book, The Art Of The Checkmate. I am not even sure whether the book included his victory over an amateur or his defeat at the hands of one of the chess legends like Capablanca or Alekhine.

I thought he was just another „less important“ player from the history of chess, say, like Milan Vidmar, Marmaduke Wyvill, Louis Paulsen or Lajos Portisch.

But today I read his Wikipedia page and realized how superficial and ignorant it is to underestimate „less important“ players. Because sir George Alan Thomas was not only much stronger chess player than I anticipated, but also one of the most remarkable human beings in history.

Apart from chess, he was also a ‘professional’ badminton and tennis player (with his achievements in badminton being particularly impressive). Some of the highlights of his career include:

• British Chess Champion in 1923 and 1924
• Shared 1st at Hastings International Chess Congress with Max Euwe and Salo Flohr, ahead of Capablanca and Botvinnik (he beat both of them in individual games)
• Quarterfinal in singles in Wimbledon (1911)
• Semi-final in doubles in Wimbledon (1907, 1912)
• Most successful player ever in the history of All England Open Badminton Championship (considered the unofficial World Badminton Championship) with 21 titles (4 in singles)
• Co-founder of International Badminton Federation
• President of International Badminton Federation from 1934-1955
• The originator of Badminton’s World Men Team Championship (akin to tennis Davis Cup). The Cup for the championship is named Thomas Cup after him.

It is surprising what you can do with all the time you have when you never marry in your life…

Happy birthday anniversary to an amazing individual and a true sportsman!

(If you like posts such as this one, check our complete list of Chess Birthdays )

The post Sir George Alan Thomas Birthday appeared first on Chessentials.

]]>
https://chessentials.com/sir-george-alan-thomas/feed/ 0